Barcelona
|
New Jersey | |
Brussels
|
New York | |
Chicago
|
Northern Virginia | |
Frankfurt
|
Orange County | |
Hamburg
|
Paris | |
Hong Kong
|
San Diego | |
London
|
San Francisco | |
Los Angeles
|
Shanghai | |
Madrid
|
Silicon Valley | |
Milan
|
Singapore | |
Moscow
|
Tokyo | |
Munich
|
Washington, D.C. |
Attention: | H. Christopher Owings Scott Anderegg |
Re: | Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. Amendment No. 7 Registration Statement on Form S-1 File No. 333-144405 |
1. | We note that you seek confidential treatment for the liquidated damages schedule in Section 1.2 of the Lease. It is not clear why confidential treatment is appropriate for this entire provision. A confidential treatment request should cover only those words and phrases for which confidentiality is necessary and supported by FOIA and applicable Commission rules. Please provide us with an analysis that specifically addresses why the disclosure of this entire provision would be commercially harmful to you. Further, ensure that your discussion addresses any commercial harm that may ensue to you, as opposed to the Landlord. Refer to Section II.C.1 of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 1 (February 29, 1997). | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have re-filed the Lease (Exhibit 10.15) in the Amendment. Instead of redacting the entire liquidated damages schedule in Section 1.2, we |
have, for the reasons set forth in our confidential treatment request letter dated September 27, 2007, redacted only the dollar amounts and the Fixturing Entry Date set forth in such schedule. As explained in our confidential treatment request letter and as discussed on the telephone with Scott Anderegg on October 16, 2007, the Fixturing Entry Date is equivalent to a financial term because it relates to a free rent period. | ||
2. | We note that exhibit 10.15 refers to exhibits. Please file a complete copy of the lease with exhibits and revise your request, if applicable. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have filed a complete copy of the Lease with exhibits. We have redacted from the exhibits two pricing terms which are duplicative of identical pricing terms successfully redacted in the body of the Lease. |
cc: | Gregg R. Bodnar Robert Guttman, Esq. Seth Diehl |