Christopher D. Lueking | Sears Tower, Suite 5800 | |||
Direct Dial: (312) 876-7680 | 233 S. Wacker Dr. | |||
[email protected] | Chicago, Illinois 60606 | |||
Tel: +312.876.7700 Fax: +312.993.9767 | ||||
www.lw.com | ||||
![]() |
||||
FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES | ||||
Barcelona | New Jersey | |||
Brussels | New York | |||
Chicago | Northern Virginia | |||
Frankfurt | Orange County | |||
Hamburg | Paris | |||
Hong Kong | San Diego | |||
London | San Francisco | |||
Los Angeles | Shanghai | |||
Madrid | Silicon Valley | |||
Milan | Singapore | |||
Moscow | Tokyo | |||
Munich | Washington, D.C. | |||
File No. 025341-0028 |
1. | We note your response to comment 2 in our letter dated September 14, 2007. Please confirm that all the listed underwriters are lead or managing underwriters. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we confirm that all the listed underwriters are lead or managing underwriters. | ||
We also remind you to file your underwriting agreement in a timely manner so that we may have time to review it before you request that your registration statement become effective. We may have additional comments after reviewing it. |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have filed the underwriting agreement as Exhibit 1.1 to the Amendment. |
2. | We note your response to comments 3 and 10 in our letter dated September 14, 2007. We further note the revision to your disclosure and the materials you have provided in support of your disclosure. However, we are unable to read the data from the Kline & Co. Report concerning 2000 data. Please resubmit a legible copy of this report. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have resubmitted a legible printed copy of the Kline & Co. report. | ||
In addition, we did not find support in your materials for your statement on page 62 that Generation X has grown up shopping in specialty stores and seeks a retail environment that combines a compelling experience, functionality, variety and location. Please revise or provide support for this statement. Please also characterize your statement on page 1 as your belief where you refer to intimidating, commission-oriented and brand-dedicated sales approach and level of service typically unavailable in drug stores and mass merchandisers. | ||
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see pages 1, 55 and 62. |
3. | We note your response to comment 6 in our letter dated September 14, 2007. Currently, it appears that you are including more than one risk factor under this subheading. Avoid bundling risks and if a risk is material, provide it with its own descriptive subheading. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see page 15. |
4. | Clarify in this discussion, as you indicated in your response to comment 43 to our letter dated August 3, 2007, that the prior employment packages of Messrs. Bodnar and Barkus were instrumental in developing their compensation packages at the time they were hired. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see page 77. | ||
5. | We note your response to prior comment 10 in our letter dated September 14, 2007. We note your revised disclosure indicating that the company reviewed general and retail industry surveys to determine the market level raises for other executives. Please revise your disclosure to clarify what components of the general and retail industry surveys assisted you in determining the market level raises and clarify whether you arc referring to salary, bonus or all aspects of compensation. In this regard, explain how the surveys were used and generally indicate what companies comprised the general and retail categories of the surveys. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see pages 77-78. | ||
6. | In your discussion of Annual Bonuses, please define your internally defined operating earnings target in your disclosure. Please also further explain the likelihood of meeting the challenging performance targets you discuss here for 2007. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see page 79. |
7. | Prior to requesting effectiveness, please file an amendment which deletes the to be issued language included in the auditors report. Also, the dual dating information in the accountants report needs to be completed. Similar revisions need to be made in an updated accountants consent filed as Exhibit 23. | |
Response: We supplementally advise the Staff that prior to requesting effectiveness of the registration statement, we will file an amendment which revises the auditors report to delete the to be issued language and complete the dual dating information. In addition, corresponding revisions will be made in an updated accountants consent, which will be filed as Exhibit 23 to the Registration Statement. |
8. | The second bullet point in the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data section on page F-12 includes the proceeds received in the pending initial public offering. We believe the purpose of this pro forma information is to show the company prior to the new investment; therefore, it is inappropriate to include offering proceeds. Please revise the pro forma presentation to exclude offering proceeds. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have revised the pro forma presentation to exclude offering proceeds. Accordingly, we have reclassified $89,405,000 of preferred stock accumulated dividends in arrears from Preferred Stock to Preferred Dividends Payable in the consolidated balance sheet in order to reflect the dividends as a liability of the Company. Please see pages F-3 and F-12. | ||
9. | The pro forma presentation in the historical financial statements includes an adjustment of notes payable. Please expand the disclosure to explain why this adjustment is appropriate and how the amount was determined. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see page F-12. | ||
10. | Please consider expanding the pro forma disclosure in the financial statement footnote to explain the difference in the actual expected payout of preferred dividends at a future date, and the amount that has been earned as of the financial statement date. It appears this would be useful information to a reader and would make the disclosure consistent with that included in the text of the document. Please revise or advise. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have disclosed that the accumulated dividends in arrears at the date of the initial public offering are expected to be approximately $93.4 million. Please see page F-12. |
11. | Please expand your disclosure of the pro forma earnings per share calculation to clarify what adjustments you made to both the numerator and denominator of the earnings per share calculation. The expanded disclosure should clarify why the adjustment is appropriate as well as how the amount was calculated. | |
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, we have disclosed that unaudited pro forma net income per share includes the conversion of the preferred stock, issuance of common shares associated with the initial public offering, and the elimination of the |
related preferred stock dividends for fiscal 2006 and the six months ended August 4, 2007. Please see page F-13. |
12. | We note that the legal opinion refers to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. Please have counsel confirm for us in writing that the legality opinion concurs with our understanding that the reference and limitation to the Delaware General Corporation Law includes the statutory provisions and also all applicable provisions of the Delaware Constitution and the reported judicial cases interpreting those laws currently in effect. Please file this confirmation as correspondence on the EDGAR system. | |
Response: Latham & Watkins LLP, counsel to the Company, confirms the SECs understanding that the reference and limitation to Delaware General Corporation Law in our opinion includes the statutory provisions and also all applicable provisions of the Delaware Constitution and the reported judicial cases interpreting those laws currently in effect. |
Very truly yours, /s/ Christopher D. Lueking Christopher D. Lueking of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP |
||||
cc:
|
Gregg R. Bodnar | |
Robert Guttman, Esq. | ||
Seth Diehl |